簡潔（但不需要借助于復(fù)雜的技巧）的代碼顯然更加容易閱讀和理解，從而大大加快了開發(fā)的速度。的確，在這個信息過載的時代，簡潔越來越顯示出強大的力量
刪繁就簡三秋樹，標(biāo)新立異二月花。繁瑣、夸張的巴洛克藝術(shù)，無論其多么精致、多么吸引眼球，都無法在這個高度內(nèi)卷的年代逃脫批判。
我們需要那些能夠成為我們直覺的工具、符號和思想，以便讓我們能夠快速響應(yīng)這日益復(fù)雜的世界
簡單即是美。
語言的簡潔、優(yōu)美在Python中的地位是如此重要，以至于它被寫進(jìn)了Python“憲章”——PEP20
import this Beautiful is better than ugly. 優(yōu)美勝于丑陋 Explicit is better than implicit. 明了勝于晦澀 Simple is better than complex. 簡單優(yōu)于復(fù)雜 Complex is better than complicated. 復(fù)雜優(yōu)于凌亂 Flat is better than nested. 扁平好過嵌套 Sparse is better than dense. 稀疏強于稠密 Readability counts. 可讀性很重要！ Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules. 特例亦不可違背原則 Although practicality beats purity. 即使實用戰(zhàn)勝了純粹 Errors should never pass silently. 錯誤絕不能悄悄忽略 Unless explicitly silenced. 除非我們確定需要如此 In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. 面對不確定性，拒絕妄加猜測 There should be one -- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it. 永遠(yuǎn)都應(yīng)該只有一種顯而易見的解決之道 Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch. 即便解決之道起初看起來并不顯而易見 Now is better than never. 做總比不做強 Although never is often better than *right* now. 然而不假思索還不如不做 If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea. 難以名狀的，必然是壞的 If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea. 易以言傳的，可能是好的 Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those! 名字空間是個絕妙的主意，請好好使用！
